9.27.2010

Sammy The Sperm

I promised some guest material.  I promised it earlier than you are getting it, but I had a lot of school work this week, and I pooped my pants three days in a row which threw me into a spiraling depression of self-doubt and writers block.

It's so hard to write with muddy pants.

Anyway, the following is a story that a friend of mine wrote in high school, along with the teacher's reaction to the story, and some illustrations of the story by me.  Because, let's face it: what's funnier than an anthropomorphic sperm?  Not too fuckin' much.

The writer of the story and the teacher grading the story will remain anonymous, but let the author know what you think of his high school flight of fancy.  Did you ever write some hilarious stuff in school?  Was it also about jizz?

Thanks to everyone for continuing to "follow" me despite my inability to be a very active blogger of late.  You are all awesome.

Here we go....

















Let me know what you think about Sammy and his adventure.

Love.

9.19.2010

The Oldest Profession, or: Craigslist Woes

I'm not going to go into too much detail regarding my extended blog-cation over the last week or so except to tell you guys that I have been very busy with school and other such things.  I kind of go in cycles with the whole blogging/social-networking thing.  I thrive on being "plugged in" for extended periods of time, but then find myself in need of some time off, where I have little to no access to the social technology that is ever present and, sometimes, a bit intrusive in my life.  I apologize to anyone who might be upset with my absence.  I will make it up to you.

As promised last time, I have a couple of guests blogs in the works that will, with a little elbow grease, be published here this week.  Also, I would like to thank everyone for not pointing out my terrible and obvious math error in my last post.  One person pointed it out to me privately, as to help me save face and not look like a total degenerate idiot.  But we all know the truth anyway, right?  So I decided not to amend the error, because degeneracy is a warm cocoon of comfort.  If you wish, review the blog precedeing this one and then make fun of me in the comment section on this post.  That will do just fine.  Remember when I was talking about going back to school, and I showed you this artist's rendering of me...


...?  Well, I wasn't just whistling Dixie.  So there you go.

Now, on to the point here.  The subject of this post is, loosely, prostitutes.

This post was sparked by the following event:

A few days back I was at the local market getting some food and nicotine supplies, and as I went to get back into my truck, I noticed a few home-printed pictures laying on the ground next to my driver's door. They were paper clipped together.  Here are two of those pictures.



I was curious, but more so, I was kind of grossed out.  Now here's the deal: I get tired enough of seeing half naked nineteen year old girls on advertisements for goddamn-near everything in this country.  I find all the sexuality degrading to the collective American intellect.  But I guess nearly naked nineteen year olds sell peanut butter, so there's probably no stopping that.  But the lady in the pictures I found was old enough, as you can see, to be my grandmother, which added an extra degree of ickiness to them.  I did find them somewhat humorous, though.  Then I turned one of the pictures over and realized that the photos were either a kind of personal ad, or a kind of erotic service ad.  The writing was as follows:
When I go out with guys and take off my coat or sweater and they see these big 32DD's, their eyes about fall out.  They are so big because I'm so small at 5'0" and 117 lbs.  9 lbs of me is my titts.     Lucy.
There was no contact information, but I presume contact info and rates may have been on a separate picture that escaped the paperclip.  I found highly interesting, for some reason, Lucy's use of a double "t" in the word "tits".  I found the photos in general, though, gross and alarming and I immediately thought "my blog readers would like to see this".

Lucy, I'm sorry that your pictures had to end up on the internet.  But since they had already ended up in the King Soopers parking lot, I figure you probably don't care much.

Here's my argument.

Craigslist Should Not Be Pressured To Censor Erotic Services Ads

You can read up a little bit on the Craigslist hubbub here at the Gray Lady.  The long and short of the situation is that Craigslist used to have an "erotic services" section on their free classified ad web page.  At some point, Craigslist bowed to judicial pressure and began to require a credit card number and a small sum of money for a person to post an "erotic services" ad.  This was done to help investigators root out illegal behavior.  This still gave the police little to work with though, because of a little thing we like to call entrapment.  A cop would have to divulge to an erotic service provider, at his or her request, whether or not he or she was indeed a cop, making his feeble attempt to enforce the law a moot point.

The listing of the ads used to look like this:


The ads were always cryptic and never spelled out exactly what the service provided was.  Usually it just offered hourly rates.  As things moved forward, though, further pressure forced Craigslist to temporarily stop all of the ads.  One million perverts lamented on the day they logged onto their beloved Craigslist and saw this:


That's right.  A big fat "censored" bar over their gateway to mind bending and, presumably, expensive sexual deviancy.  

Craigslist, last week, went even further by totally removing the "erotic services" section, and saying that they would not be bringing it back.  Ever.  The government morality police won.

I find this to be ludicrous for a lot of reasons.  First of all, being the kind of guy I am, I don't cotton well to government defining morality for us in instances where consenting adults are making choices alone or amongst themselves that aren't directly harming anyone else.  The very principle of the government telling its constituency what they can or cannot do with their own bodies is vile to me. 

I can delve further into the details here, though, and say that it is especially obscene to me that the government has created such laws to the direct detriment of some of the most underprivileged people in existence.  Few could argue that the majority of sex workers are inner city African American women who were raised in government subsidized dope/welfare traps.  The schools in those areas (as public schools everywhere increasingly do) likely robbed the majority of these women of any semblance education.  These are arguably the most vulnerable people in America.  And what makes their lives so terrible, more than likely, is not primarily their choice to ingest hard drugs or their choice to have sex for a living.  What makes it terrible is that drug law and prostitution law has made a fair market for these people non-existant.  The chips are stacked against them in every way.  Instances of violence and death among these women are alarmingly high, as the intersection of the drug and sex black markets makes them the ideal target of horrible abuse.  Because the government has relegated them into the lowest postion in society, they stand little chance of escaping, or barring that, making a reasonable living of what is commonly known as the "oldest profession".

Craigslist is not the only website on the internet offering such advertisement services for working women (and men).  In fact, there are many such websites, and the practice of soliciting Johns on the web will not go away any time soon.  Probably never.  The fact is, though, that Craigslist was making it safer for some sex workers to do what they do.  Rather than rely on a pimp, who is likely abusive, demanding and unfair, a worker could take his or her business into their own hands and keep a greater percent of the money they made (namely, 100%).  A worker naming her own terms in regards to "whens," "wheres," and "hows" is much less likely to be beaten or robbed (or worse) than a worker standing on a darkened street corner in one of America's many dope traps.  Craigslist was empowering these workers in some instances to avoid (or crawl out of) a situation that could only be living hell.

The Oldest Profession

Look at these monkeys.

Capuchin Monkeys

They look pretty happy and shit, right?  They don't look morally crooked or sexually deviant, do they?  Well here's the real story on prostitution.  When they call it the "oldest profession", they are not kidding.  Check out this article from the New York Times magazine.  You may be amazed, as I was, to read about a "behavioral economist", Keith Chen, and the monkeys he was experimenting on.  

His experiment was to see if a group of capuchin monkeys could understand the basic principles of economics in regards to currency.  Chen taught the monkeys, over time, to "buy" cubes of Jell-O, grapes and apples with the currency he introduced to them.  Chen was amazed at how quickly the monkeys caught on to the concept.  He was even further amazed when he introduced "market shocks" to the snack array available to the monkeys.  When the price of Jell-O went up, the monkeys would stop buying Jell-O with their coins, understanding very well that they were getting more bang for their buck on apples and grapes.  The research went on, and the monkeys loved their Jell-O when the price was good.

Then, apparently, a heist of sorts took place, and one of the monkeys distributed a whole load of the coins to the population.  Now the monkeys had coins in their own living area, where before the coins had only ever been present in the "snack store area".

A few days later, Chen observed an amazing thing.  He watched one of the male monkeys walk up to one of the females and give her some coins.  Knowing full well that the male understood the value of his currency, Chen thought at first that he might have witnessed true primate altruism.

But just before he could be sure, Chen saw that the male monkey promptly began to engage in sex with the female monkey.  The monkeys were paying for sex.  There was no way around the conclusion.  This was a genuine monkey sex worker.

That, friends, is what they mean when they say that it is the "oldest profession".  We were likely paying for sex the day we learned how to bash each other with old femur bones ala 2001: A Space Odyssey.
  
So who is the judiciary to tell Craigslist not to allow advertising for such services for a nominal fee?  Who is the government to demonize these people and cast them out of society and into a realm where health care and personal security are not even an option?  And who is Craigslist, furthermore, to back down from this kind of bullying, instead of standing up for all of our rights to be prostitutes if we are so inclined?  If they are concerned about sex slavery, their best bet is to legalize prostitution across the board so that law enforcement officials will be able to zero in on that disgusting activity without having to waste their time with the thousands of false positives found in women and men who legitimately want to work in the sex trade.  The government's stance here, like in so many other places, is criminal.  

But folks, the number one reason Craigslist should re-open their erotic services section is in the hopes that none of us will ever ever have to see something like this:



... next to our vehicles as we leave a grocery store again.  Because, I'll be frank, I was going home to make dinner immediately after that, but after seeing these pictures, I had totally lost my appetite.  Sorry Lucy.  Keep that shit on the internet where it belongs.  Or it might end up here.  Hopefully none of your grandkids read my blog.

Love.

9.11.2010

Stats 'N' Stuff

Remember this post from a few days back?

It was a somewhat disjointed post.  I informed you all that I was officially six months clean.  There was a photo of the week, and in the end I ran out of steam and just asked a bunch of (fairly) random questions.

We got quite a few responses to the questions, and I wanted to take the time to show you the results.  Keep in mind that many people only answered certain questions.  It was a very small sample of answers.  Not only are the answers not indicative of the population as a whole, but they may not even be truly indicative of the readers of this blog in general.  Even still, I had fun going over the numbers.  Here are some of the results.

To Blog or Not to Blog


Of the people responding to that post, only 4% were shown to be non-blog writers.  22% of respondents made no indication in the body of their comment whether or not they were blog writers.  Here the data had to be skewed slightly, because I knew that some from this group were blog writers.  If someone didn't respond to the "do you write a blog" question, but I was familiar with their blog beforehand, I put them into the "writes a blog" category.  The respondents indicating that they blog numbered 74%.  I believe the "writes a blog" figure would have been higher had everyone given an explicit yes or no answer to this question.

Where Are You From


Readers of In Review who responded on the day of the posting in question proved to be from a wide range of places.  Here they are:

California - 4 readers
Florida - 2 readers
Australia - 2 readers
Trinidad and Tobago - 1 reader
Kansas - 1 reader
The UK - 3 readers
North Carolina - 1 reader
Atlanta - 1 reader
Ohio - 1 reader
Canada - 2 readers
New York - 1 reader
Texas - 2 readers
Pennsylvania - 1 reader
St. Louis - 1 reader
Utah - 1 reader
New Jersey - 1 reader

Again, not all respondents answered this question.  But just glancing at the list of folks who did respond gives us a pretty good idea of the kind of scope a blog can attain in just a few short months of operation. Pretty cool.

How Do You Find Blogs To Read?


I will just give you a quick list of the most popular ways readers responding that day use to find blogs to read.  The most common ones were:

-Word of Mouth
-Blog Rolls (link lists from other blogs)
-Comments On Other Blogs
-Red Means Go! (Annah, you are a connector)
-Blog Of Note (the blogger system's daily blog recognition feature)

There were some other ones but these seemed most signifcant.

How Old Are You?


This data really made me smile.  Quick stats of note regarding respondents to this question are as follows:

Youngest Reader - 17 years old (WOOT!)
Oldest Reader - 63 years old (I am humbled by this)
Average Age of Reader - 30.04 years old

Yay Or Nay On Capital Punishment?


I threw some of these questions in essentially as a farce, but this outcome really surprised me.  First, I should be clear that some of the "yays" and some of the "nays" were teetering on being "undecided" but I tried to ascertain the feeling behind the response and compile a list that was as close to accurate as possible.  I am displaying this stat visually below.


The cartoonishly dead convict indicates the 66% of respondents who voiced support for the death penalty, while the less dead convict (scaled to the correct proportion) indicates the 44% of respondents against the death penalty.  These data took me by surprise.  I would have guessed surely that it would be reversed.  I wonder how this would turn out in a larger sampling of the readers here, but these numbers point to the fact that In Review readers like their child molesters and multi-murderers deader than shit.  What do you guys make of these stats?

Were You Aware That Anthropomorphic CO2 Emissions Account For A Mere 2% Of Global Yearly CO2 Emissions?


Here, the cow represents the 58% of respondents who said that they were not aware of the statistic.  The man in the suit indicates the 42% who were previously aware.  There were a lot of "not answered" points on this question, which leads me to believe that people are either A) not interested, B) skeptical of the stat I gave or C) increasingly aware of stats like this, but not willing to stop watching "An Inconvenient Truth" every Friday night while they burn patchouli and weave renewable grocery bags out of hemp just yet.

With the IPCC recently convening and talking about the need for more "transparency," of which there has been very little (their way of admitting that numbers have been buried or skewed), and with more and more people willing to look at the bigger picture, perhaps soon we will be able to get that cow figure to shrink a bit.  Environmental concerns that don't involve ridiculous cap and trade schemes or complicated hustles to redistribute wealth to bureaucracies that would mis-spend it before they even knew they had it are still very important today.  Perhaps we ought to go back to thinking about getting potable water to the world and eradicating malaria, and worry less about our 2% of carbon emissions.  (Please, God, don't let Al Gore read this.)

Should I Change The Format Of In Review To The "Dear Abby" Format?


38% of respondents indicated that I should try out (occasionally) a "Dear Abby" style thing.  I should be clear though and explain that every one of those 38% had some kind of qualifier regarding how the "Dear Abby" thing would work.  Everyone had great ideas, and no one advocated a straight up format.  Rather I was offered myriad ideas about how to change the "Dear Abby" style into something funnier.  62% responded with a resounding "NO", and the numbers are reflected above.  The figure of Abby on the right is what I figured many of that 62% thought of "Dear Abby" in the first place.

And finally...

Heinz 57 or A1 Steak Sauce?


I quite like this graphic.  I used syrup to represent the people that indicated firmly that they preferred neither A1 nor Heinz 57.  The idea of syrup on steak makes me chuckle.

I don't put anything on my steak aside from raw horseradish and sometimes a dash of salt.

Medium rare for me.

And so I will retire this little post here, asking you guys what you thought of all of this, and if you think I should do some more polling?  I will need to do it in a more clear and concise way next time, because getting the data points out of all of the comments last time was arduous and time consuming.  But I think it would be fun to learn more about the minds behind the readers here.

If you write a blog, would you be interested at all in running a survey concurrently with mine, so that we might get a larger perspective?  

Look forward this week to a couple of guest posts here, by people who are not currently bloggers.  One post is a hilarious writing about an anthropomorphic sperm and his quest to learn from other sperm and, in the end, beat other sperm in order to swim his way up into an egg.  It was written by a high school student who I later befriended.  The other posting will be in the vein of the works of Terence Mckenna and Timothy Leary, psychonaut extraordinaires.  Written by an individual I have known since third grade.  

One more tiny thing:

Fists Who Now?!

Love

9.08.2010

What In Fuck's Name Is A "Snookie"?!

Hey guys.

Sorry about the blogging hiatus.  'Round here we've been inundated with reading for school, finishing reading "Game Change" for personal pleasure, travelling to Utah, and other things.

I'll jump right into this, though...

I'm in class today.  The class is Western Civilization, from 1650 until today.  Our teacher's a bit eccentric.  That is to say that our teacher is a card carrying member of the communist party, who in some disgusting cliche, some obtuse parody of what he wished he could have been, mentions daily that he lived in the "sixties", as if that were some kind of special qualification.

You lived in the 1960's?  No shit?!  With the small size of the baby boomer population, you must be totally fucking unique, right Mr. Merry-Prankster-Has-Been?  My God, I don't think I know anyone else who ever lived in the "sixties".  I certainly don't know anyone else who ever experimented with illicit psychoactive drugs or had revolutionary ideas about American society.  Please, let me shower you with awe, kind sir.

You are a national treasure.  You are just like the Beatles and Hunter Thompson.

Oh.  Wait....

Back to reality, with a news flash: Hunter Thompson couldn't finish a single fucking written work without The Rolling Stone sending him some kind of literate aid to essentially write the shit for him because he was too drunk to even slam the fucking keys on the typewriter, and the Beatles are the most overrated musical act of their time.



For good drunk writers, stick with Bukowski.  For good baby boomer music, stick with the Stones.

I digress.  Mr. Prankster-Has-Been was late today, if only to propagate his persona as a brilliant Bohemian somebody/nobody.  While we waited for him to arrive, I listened in on the conversations of the students around me.  Nothing makes me want to have my head bitten off by a mutant rabbit more than listening to people between the ages of 18 and 23 talk to eachother.


A loud girl with a Chicago-style accent was telling a guy with a pink and green neon backpack and one of these...


... that she lives in Boulder and that she loves it, but that it's too expensive, and blah blah blah.  She proceeded to tell him/everyone-around-her that she works at Cheeba Hut (a marijuana themed sandwich restaurant, for the uninitiated) on "The Hill" in Boulder.  She said that it sucked, but it had it's advantages, like being able to get "...high and crunk all day long, while working."

Crunk?

Did you use the word "crunk"??

What is wrong with these people?  When I heard her say it, I glanced up to see if those around her would stare her down derisively for using what amounts to an MTV marketing/hip-hop buzzword as part of her daily lexicon.  I waited... and waited...

The necessary glaring never happened.  They all laughed and seemed to agree that it would be ok for the media machine to define the way we speak through (terrible) brain dead, misogynistic rappers like Li'l Jon, or who-the-fuck-ever these assholes are.

Piss on Li'l Jon.  I hope he goes crunk driving and wraps his car up around a telephone pole, sending blood and dreadlocks flying everywhere.

Crunk may not be dead, Mr. Jon, but we would all be 
better off if you were.

Again... I digress.

As the vacuum of intellect in the room assailed my (extremely fragile) mental equilibrium, dragging me in and out of some kind of hellish-dreamscape-unconsciousness, I heard the same big mouthed girl say something about being like "Snookie".  I thought, as I have before when I have heard this term: "what the fuck is a Snookie?"

The nature of this blog post is at least two-fold: to explain to you guys what I think "Snookie" could possibly mean, and to ask you humbly to explain to me yet another pop-culture phenomenon that has escaped me until the last minute.

Here we go.

Possible Snookie Definition #1:
n. any "funk" or "gunk" residing conspicuously on one's body

Synonymous with "schmutz".

The arrows indicate the snookie.

Examples:

-Charles, you have a little snookie on your face.  Here, wipe it off with this napkin.
-Mustard, as a snookie, can be dangerous, as it is a potent skin staining agent.
-The actress Angelina Jolie loves nothing more than to be covered in loads and loads of hot snookie.

This is a possible definition just because I think it sounds right.  Try it out, dear reader.  Say "Charles, you have a little snookie on your face" out loud right now and you will agree, this is a good guess as to the definition of this word.

Possible Snookie Definition #2:
n. a new brand of cookie marketed to children and shaped like snakes

Snake + Cookie = Snookie.  Am I right?

Examples:

-I could really go for a chocolate chip snookie right about now.
-On Christmas eve this year, we plan on leaving milk and snookies out for Santa.
-Why, Billy?!?  Why did you feed me poisoned snookies?!  I'll see you in hell you... you... *gurgles out last breath*. 

Possible Snookie Definition #3:
v. to blow-dry one's testicles post-shower, and immediately use a liberal application of baby powder on said testicles

Me, snookying away.

You guys remember this post, here, in which I explained how to blow-dry and baby powder your nuts in order to avoid "Yoda Balls", right?  Well, I didn't have a good word for the entire process itself.  Perhaps my (dad's) idea has caught on in such a big way that it has become part of pop-culture at large, and has been named "snookying".

Examples:

-Since I started snookying, I have had perfect day after perfect day.  My whole world just gets better and better.
-When snookying, it is important to use a baby powder product that will not be carcinogenic if introduced to a woman's uterus.
-Honey, you smell disgusting.  Why don't you snookie anymore?  You used to when we were first going out....

Possible Snookie Definition #4: 
adj. being particularly ugly, either physically or ideologically

This one makes sense just because I don't have any affinity for the kind of people I have seen talking about snookie in passing.  Well, I guess it doesn't actually make sense.  I'm just associating the word with the people using it most frequently.

Examples:

-I can't decide who is more snookie... is it Al Gore, or Elena Kagan?  They are both so snookie it makes my eyes burn.
-The snookiness inherent in the resistance to the "Park 51" Cordoba House Project is readily apparent to anyone not advocating a theocratic American government.
-I have a huge snookie-ass boil growin' on my leg.
I'm sorry... I had to do it again.

Possible Snookie Definition #5: 
n. some horrible anal hair of a woman who has attained fame and fortune by degrading herself and all other women in the world, effectively relegating herself and all of her fans to a backwoods, archaic understanding of sex, intellect, and cultural norms

Synonymous with: prostitute; whore; average celebrity in 2010; Justin Beiber

I find this definition most likely.  This is the definition I am betting on, and is clearly the most realistic option from what I have deduced through context.  If this is an accurate definition of snookie, then a pox on all snookies.  A horrible pox.  A crippling, deforming pox.

Some snookies of note.


Examples:

-I like living in a trailer that is part household, part meth lab, and I am proud that my kids will grow up to be tremendous snookies.
-It boggles the mind that people watch all these snookie-centric television shows.
-The difference between a snookie like Lady GaGa and a legitimate professional prostitute is that a professional prostitute is not lying to every one of her customers, and she is not actively advocating for millions of young women to join in her profession.
****

Alright.  That's it folks.  I don't know what a snookie is, but I'd like for you guys to let me know what you think of my definitions.  If you don't know what a snookie is, which of my definitions do you find to be most likely correct?  Or do you have some definition of your own that you could offer?  If you do know what a snookie is, would you let me know?  I hate being out of the loop, and I feel that it will be easier for me to interact with my fellow American youth with this information under my belt.

Thanks for putting up with this raving and ranting.

I need to go take a huge snookie.  Until next time...

Love.

9.01.2010

Open Love Note...

An Open Note for Jera


Jera,

Do you think me crazy?  Do you think me out of my mind, in any sense, literal or ephemeral?  Do you think me as crazy as some may and, undoubtedly, some will?  Do you believe like I believe?  Do you believe that I believe?

I believe:

...that since the day you were born, the sun has risen and fallen in the sky for you.  The clockwork of the universal order, ticking away the lives of billions of people, saw fit to set aside the sunrise and the sunset for you.

...that everyday you share the movement of the sun with me is absolutely the best day of my life.  Every single day.  The best day.

...that people will think that I am crazy for believing that there was no other way, no other path, for me aside from the one I walk down holding you next to me.

...that love is something that, despite the efforts of millions of poets and writers and philosophers over thousands of years, could not be defined for me until the day I met you.

...that our paths crossed in step with the beautiful way in which the universe attempts to order itself.  That our paths having crossed is, for me, the greatest representation of reality moving from chaos to perfect order.

...that you are important, in a way that is probably not meant to be understood by man.  I can smell the fire inside of you when I am near you.  I can see the hand of an anonymous and benevolent God in the way that you move.

...that our love, specifically and definitively, will change the world.

...that no other person could have done what you did for me.

...that I would be dead or dying today had I not met you.

...that any day you wake up and don't understand resolutely that the sun rose that day just for you, you may very well be stealing from God.

...that any day you wake up and know that I believe these things, and move your hands according to the fire inside of you, you awaken more fully a greatness in you that will inevitably be recognized by all who bear witness to it.

...that I was meant for you.  That my hands were meant for you.

...that I could not know love like this outside of you.


I give you my hands.  Hold them.  Wring them.  Work them.  Do what you will with them.  My hands are yours.

People would think me crazy if they knew what I really believed.

But you know.

You know.

Love.