8.28.2010

In Review: Twilight (From Charles)

So we reach the end here of our little Twilight adventure. I know some of you have been curious to see what I thought of the book. I have been having trouble deciding how to review the book, and in a way, I've been deliberating about what I really thought of it.

If you have missed the related posts here, let's review real quick:

First, I asked readers to select a book out of a list of three for me to read, by vote, here. I chose the three books (The Audactiy of Hope, Going Rogue, or Twilight) because I thought that reading any of these books would do me good. The idea here, which I try to live by, is that it is good to open oneself to those things that seem least attractive to us on occasion. Sometimes, doing this, I am proven wrong, or at least blown away by how little I actually knew about something or someone. Sometimes, I am totally reaffirmed in my preconceptions. But each and every time I branch out and try to learn or experience something of which I already have (harsh) opinions, I find myself on better ground to offer any further opinion.

Second, I announced the winner, here. The winner, by a healthy margin, was the book Twilight. Twilight, specifically, was on the list because I had an inkling that the book (and the associated pop-culture phenomenon) was more or less a load of horse-shit. My preconceptions about the book were that it would be completely juvenile, poorly constructed, pandering to the lowest common denominator of the female teenage demographic, and that I would be totally disgusted that such an overwhelming popularity had grown around such a shit book. I figured that it would be full of thinly veiled sexual innuendo and that the book would have a message of conformity to the status quo as far as gender roles and sexuality go in middle America. I assumed that it would be the kind of smut an evangelical Christian pastor might let his daughter read.

Third, we heard from a real life vampire, named Count Dread, on the topic. His guest blog can be read here. Count Dread is an acquaintance of mine, but as you could tell from his op-ed piece, he and I have a few differences that we haven't completely worked out between us. Some of you voiced that you would like to see Dread return later for more pieces, and he expressed to me privately an interest in doing just that. Some of you were downright valiant in your defense of me in the comments section on Dread's post, which I really appreciated. You guys are my vampire hunting heros. I don't need to say much else except that, again, I am not a vampire, and that Count Dread is a little sissy bastard child, and that he can blow a giraffe, for all I care. Count Dread: I don't owe you shit, you accent talking, Halloween dressing pale piss-ant.

Fourth, and most recently, a girl named Julia reviewed the book for us, here. Julia is fifteen years old, and attends a high school in the same town where I currently live. It took me about three hours to edit Julia's blog post, but I left in a lot of her quaint mis-spellings and whatnot because I felt that they really helped reflect the kind of education kids are getting these days in America (the bureaucracy really does work! *rolls eyes*). Julia loved Twilight, and among other things, neon colors and skinny jeans. There was a mixed response to Julia's post. Most of you guys found it funny, which I was glad about. For the record: I like the band Muse. As you can see below, I have them on my phone's playlist. 


Furthermore, Julia is more of an individual than she might give herself credit for, as she clearly represents a hodge-podge of cultural memes, as opposed to just one. As some of you pointed out, she may not be as “scene” or “emo” as she might be telling herself. Julia accepts that fact, and said that she would “try harder”. I believe some of you expressed interest in hearing from Julia again, and that may also be a possibility.

After the guests posts, I skipped a day to think about what I wanted to say about Twilight. To think about what my real feelings are on the book. 

Yeah... this is about right.

At long last, here they are.

I don't want to disappoint any of you by not totally tearing this book apart in proper comic fashion, but more important here is the truth. The book isn't horrible. I have read worse. It didn't make me cry tears of excruciating pain, as predicted. It was not the most eloquently written thing I have ever read, and as some have pointed out, it gets a little repetitive at times. But the plot was relatively unpredictable, and the story was easy to follow. It was just interesting enough to compel me to the end of the book.

The compulsion to finish the book was to see what was finally going to happen with this “Edward” character. My interest in the main character, “Bella Swan” was overshadowed by my curiosity about what kind of amazing feats Edward might perform in the heat of battle. The story was set up perfectly for some all out carnage, with buildings getting knocked down and cars getting blown up. Edward's investment in Bella was clearly so deep that he would certainly kill or maim anyone that got between them. But alas, the book errs on the side of romance, and the climax, while somewhat exciting, left a lot to be desired. No buildings fell down.

This would have been a proper ending to this book.


Ultimately, I prefer action when vampires are involved.  I prefer this style of vampire, I guess:

Not that this is much better... but the action scenes were good.

As a lot of you guys pointed out, Bella is probably not the best role model for a young girl. She is set up at the beginning of the book as being self assured and able to take care of herself, but the author quickly abandons this concept for her character, and turns her into a helpless sack of meat who is hopelessly in love and ready to sacrifice anything for her cold blooded hero. While I do find the character antithetical to what I might want my hypothetical daughter to use as a role model, Bella is a far cry from the “Jersey Girls” or the latest harlot fare depicted on any number of reality TV shows. At least she doesn't represent the hooker-chic that so many other females in mass-media do today. I suppose it's give and take in this realm.

Some fictional female role models, displayed mathematically.

I anticipated this book sucking so much harder than it did because I tend to be grossed out by things that become very popular with the broader population (especially with regards to media that become popular with the youth). I don't know why that is, but I find it useful to inoculate myself with pieces of that cultural stew now and again, for perspective.

I am giving the book a rating of three Charles heads. As per usual, this is out of a maximum possible five Charles heads.



I will say this: the fact that this book was the beginning of a multi-million dollar franchise that has (apparently) sucked in just about every girl in America is still alarming to me. I find it most disturbing that the books, as far as I can tell, have taken a back seat to the movies. I have not seen the movies, and don't know that I will. The book, of itself, although not perfect in a literary sense, represents something great: the fact that kids can be compelled to turn off their Xboxes and read a book now and again. As usual, though, Hollywood seems to have ruined that, and I wonder how many kids are just watching the movie instead of reading the book.

It is disturbing how quickly the Hollywood media machine can drive a spike like Twilight into the consciousness of millions of people. It could be argued that the book has value, both as a story and as a tool to help encourage children to value literacy more. Hollywood, as a gigantic organism, fears literacy. Hollywood stomps out literacy. Our place is in the theater or in front of our fucking televisions. Books offer knowledge that they don't control, and I believe that as Hollywood has evolved, it has realized it's greatest defense mechanism: control of information.

Encourage a kid to read this book. Encourage them to read any book. And if you have seen the movie and liked it, why not give the book a try? You might, like me, find it a lot harder to bag on Twilight if you check it out.  Or perhaps your worst predictions will be confirmed and then at least you will have a leg to stand on when ridiculing Twilight fans

The fans of Twilight are still fair game though. Skinny jeans and stupid hair included. Get with the program people! Button up shirts with long sleeves, collars popped, and chest exposed, is the ONLY way to go.  And jeans that don't force your balls to recede into your abdomen from whence they came.


Go ahead.  Take a shot.  I know I deserve it.

What do those of you who have read the book think about it? Are you all completely disappointed in my review? Have you enjoyed this little series of blog posts? Let me know.


Oh.  And one more tiny thing:


...


...I don't care what the fuck happens... there is no possible plot twist that could land me on "Team Jacob".  Screw Jacob.  Go "Team Edward"...


... I feel so dirty.  

Love.

35 comments:

The Ranter's Box said...

Nice review series Charles. I'm still not compelled to read Twilight but I completely agree with your point that people would fare far better if they were to turn off the shitty reality tv shows and crack open a book now and again... I'm just saying...

Happy Weekend, The Empress

http://rantersbox.blogspot.com

Tree_Goddess said...

Fuck. Now I have to read it. I trust your judgement, you're usually right...dick. I liked the guest blogs. Good touch.
As far as apperance is concerned your homoerotic dress might send more of the message you are looking for when trolling for dudes(sorry Jera)if you wear some nut huggers...think about it.

Mynx said...

I read it on a plane last year and satified my curiousity. I wasn't compelled to read the others or see the movies. My 15 year old son read it after his English teacher set an assignment to read and report on something of a different genre to what they would normally read. I think he read 3 of the 4 books before losing interest. I agree that if it does the same as the "Harry Potter" books and gets kids reading it cant be all bad.

etoile Oye said...

totally with you on the loss of a reading culture these days. Perhaps Harry Porter, Twilight, etc are not such a bad idea as you mentioned. At least they get to read (no matter the quality of the read) and they get to improve their spelling. Julia's spelling, horrendous as it is, may actually have been worse had she not read Twilight (shudders)

etoileoye.blogspot.com

SaaraTuulia said...

Thank you! I've been too stubborn to even consider the good points to Twilight, and haven't been able to control the disapproving glare I immediately send out to people who mention it. Which is pretty uncalled for, considering I used to be the biggest Anne Rice fan.

I liked the guest bloggers, but I definitely prefer your own Charles rants and reviews.

saaratuulia.blogspot.com

Charliesperanza said...

I love that you are Team Edward... awesome.

Micael Chadwick ("Rabbit") said...

I honestly tried to read this book but it was so hard to get through while trying to read around all the Spam chunks, Patio dinners, and Yoo-Hoo that I kept vomiting onto the pages...

I will just take your word for it on this one.

Liz said...

I like your watch. And I agree with you (although I am a little sad about what vampire lite).

Kalei's Best Friend said...

Great post!.. I still will not read it...Right now I am reading Jon Krakauer's book on Pat Tillman...

Waldoni said...

Great series, Charles. The fact that you challenged yourself in the first place shows a thirst for knowledge and a lack of fear to investigate points of view that you already have formed opinions of. To that end, you may want to read the others or anything else that fits the above criteria. Again, great critique, but then you fucked it up by posting a picture of that goofy metrosexual guy!

steph gas said...

speaking as a grown ass woman who absolutely loves twilight, i really appreciate the open mind you kept when reveiwing the book. i don't read it because it's a literary work of art. i know it's not nearly the best written book. i like it because it's like an escape and it doesn't make me think.

with that out of the way, i fucking love all the twilight books. and i agree with the idea that anything that gets kids to read is good. i remember all the bullshit that came out with harry potter, that it taught children witchcraft and some parents wouldn't let their kids read it. i'd rather kids read than not read, even if it's magazines or books like twilight.

super post charles <3 and team edward FTW!

http://justanotherwastedday.blogspot.com/

aurora's cross said...

OMG! Team Edward?? Really?? He is such a whiny pussy!

Pavla Romelia said...

MC Hammer ... Really?? Please tell me its 2 legit 2 quit (hey hey)

Books better than movies (obviously) but I think people were so obsessed with the books that the movies had no choice but to do well at the box office.

And heck yea Team Edward!
~Pavla
www.thedramaticcomedyofmylife.blogspot.com

Fred Miller said...

Hey, at least the Hammer was an original.

I assumed that it would be the kind of smut an evangelical Christian pastor might let his daughter read.

This quote and Dave Barry's spoof on it are all that people need to know about this book. When the Fox News morning team loved it, I knew it was bad news.

The Barreness said...

Dude. I totally commented on your first two reviews from China and it would appear that they didn't get to you.

Bloody stupid f*cking patchy internet connection.

I was all witty and sh*t too. Obviously.

Well, what evs.

I'm pleased that you didn't totally hate the book, but also slightly annoyed that I now feel unable to sniff superiorly at people whose noses I see buried in copies of the bloody thing on the tube.

No pun intended.

Now, is there any chance you could go ahead and read the Barack book, too, just so I could pretend that I did to my friends and resume superior sniffing at those far less well read than I?

Cheers mate. You're a star.

- B x

Candice said...

Well done Charles! I've really enjoyed this series of posts.

I agree that movies are the worst thing that could happen to just about every book in history. Stupid Hollywood. Well said!

I'm glad you didn't find the book to be too torturous. I told you it wouldn't suck as much as you thought it would. :)

PS: You pull off the popped collar look very nicely, it suits you. However, I wouldn't recommend that particular fashion trend to everyone. It's too creepy, especially if the guy is particularly obese, hairy, and/or sweaty. Just sayin'.

PPS: Welcome to Team Edward, aka: The Smart People.

http://candicesstories.blogspot.com/

Chanel said...

I just want to say that "Julia" gave me a headache and reminded me of my little sisters, and "Dread" was a jerk-face. And skinny jeans are unacceptable on men. And popped collars are tacky. Always.

I agree that you should encourage people to read Twilight if only to get them to read something. I actually wrote a blog about it not too long ago when my sister and I were at a book store and some jerk laid into her for liking Twilight which really made me angry...but that's neither here nor there. That's not an invitation to read my blog. My blog is crap compared to this, so don't. I'm just saying that I agree that reading THIS book is better than reading NO books.

I actually like Twilight. I'm not a like a Twihard or anything. Okay, I admit...I went to buy the fourth book at the midnight release...and I've been to the midnight premiere for every movie. But it's something I share with my sisters. I don't like Bella's obsessive, clingy attitude or Edward's desire to "protect" her, which is really just a control thing. I hate that Bella has this awesome old school truck that she only drives a few times, and never when she's got a guy in the car. Edward or Jacob drive it more than she does. In real life their relationship would be considered really unhealthy.

But as a story...it's like a guilty, girly pleasure kind of read. Like I know the writing is average and it's nothing profound, but I enjoy it anyway. It's like watching Robocop. You know it's not a great movie, but you still enjoy it.

Sucker said...

How could you??? I read this book... and read it, and read it, searching for meaning.

Ah well.

-E said...

I read this book, and the first time I thought it was good. The second time I went through I recognized the shallowness of it. When you compare it to classic works there is obviously a huge literary gap, and I hated the religion and abstinence messages scattered through, but I have to admit, I did enjoy it the first time I read it.

The Adorkable Ditz said...

I don't agree or disagree with you Charles. I read the first two books before I just couldn't stand it anymore. I don't like that out of all the delicious books that are out there to devour by the massive public, my age range decides to choose this series, but that's just me.

I mean it is great that this is somewhat promoting the illiterate generation to read my books, and yes Hollywood ruins literacy, and maybe I'm just acting like a whiny b***h, but it's my opinion so shove it.

I have a lot of qualms with this book. The not so great grammar and first person narrative (seriously there is only so much of Bella's thoughts you can take), the superficialness of Jacob and Edward, how Bella treats her parents, how everyone is totally in love with Bella as soon as she moves to Forks, and Stephanie Meyer's view of the vampires in this...

I mean I LOVED what Count Dread had to say, especially when he was talking about the sparkling bit, I even loved how he even bashed how vampires can't hold an erection. It's just that the way that vampires are popular now and not always in the traditional sense of the word, it saddens me.

I think that is all that I should say about this subject before I give myself an anurism, especially since my homework is yet to be complete...

The Adorkable Ditz

http://theadorkableditzmissteps.blogspot.com/

grrrl in green said...

I think that you made a fair assessment of this book and I have to agree with what you said. I mean even though there is hype to this series at least its getting people to read. It is not the greatest book I have ever read but its not the worst.

I loved the guest blogs! I will say that Julia was annoying...
http://books-music-life.blogspot.com/

HoldenLyric said...

I can't really comment on this because I've never read the books...or even seen the movies...

But I'm so awesome because I still managed to comment.

Hell yeah.

Christine said...

HHHAAAAAAAA HAHAHAHAHAHA Your last line of "Team Edward" had me literally laughing!!!

Before I saw that, my comment was going to solely say "seriously? That's how you dress?"
I mean, popped collar? Come on... Sure I'm no fashionista but my theory is I try not to wear anything that my kids can make fun of me for in twenty years. And what's with the bieber hair? BOOYA! yeah I totally went there.

Seriously though, fair enough review. I have read them all, after much convincing, and though they're not great I was able to say "I get it" in regards to the teen craze surrounding it. I'll even watch the movies, once they're out for rent. But don't bother with the movies, unless you happen to be pms'ing and also want to eat a tub of ice cream and be reminded of the simpler times of your youth and girlhood, it'd be a perfect movie for that kind of night.

And IMO, team jacob fans are more of the movie watchers, Jacob turns into kind of an agressive stalker in the books. Totally love the alternate ending you created, I agree.

Though my household will always be "Team Dracula"

Julianna said...

I read all four books. I could have skipped the 2nd and 3rd and gone right to the fourth, since the story line is, as you said, repetitive and easy to follow. I actually hated the movies, and thought they did nothing for the books. The casting was poorly done, as was the acting. The love story got me (what can I say...I'm a squishy mushy girl) and I did like the dynamic love triangle love story that Meyer attempts with Edward, Bella, and Jacob. In the end I was also team Edward. I guess I just believe that in the end, "real" love isn't always logical. Sometimes you just have to go with what the heart wants, instead of what the mind says is good for you.

She-She said...

As usual you pull me in and entrance me with humor and an amazing knack for leading me around my screen by my nose. All I can say is'Can't touch this"!

Corianda said...

Emerson, I read the books. Yep. Read them all. My excuse is that I'm a high-school teacher and need to be up on what the kids like.
Would you say you are now at least 37% dumber or do you now not understand percentages because you are, as a result of reading this book, 37% dumber.
Hang on, just to clarify and not allow you room to make a smart comment about how I've read this and thus must have diminished mental capacity: my intelligence levels were already WAY above the usual quota, so now I'm just slightly above average rather than super sonic smart. Like before.
Just sayin.
x
Corianda
http://corianda-corianda.blogspot.com

Dani-Q said...

I have to agree with Christine on her view of book Jacob - I personally think he's more manipulative than Edward, and plays on Bella's feelings just to get what he wants... dick.

And Charles, once I read that last line I think I fell in love you. Whilst most people find it embarrassing, I will admit that I am a Twi-hard and have read all the book an average of 12 times each... yes, I calculated the average... and they're not that great after the 10th time. However, I will forever love Edward, and the series - though Breaking Dawn was a huge disappointment.

It is an escape, as unfortunately reality will never provide such an uncomplicated existence, with the worse thing in your life being a vengeful vampire out to kill you whilst you have an even stronger, ridiculously perfect, handsome vampire (who loves you) to protect you.

*sigh*

Anyway, great review - loved it! I'm glad the writing didn't throw you off the story line - and I share your disappointment in the anti-climatic "fight" scene. I think you'll notice there is only about one fight scene in all four books.

Dani-Q

http://thedaniquechronicles.blogspot.com

Carey S. said...

i really like the idea of the guest blogs, but these two have to go. dread's a tool, and julia is an annoying, whiny twit. just grow up, julia, willya?

anyways, i was hoping that you'd hate the book and was looking forward to your lacerating wit. i'm still having difficulty with the 3 charles heads rating. seriously? but i guess i'll never know, cuz i sure as hell am not reading this crap!
now, can you get back to work and read "going rogue"? and do us all a favor and hate it?

thanks for doing our dirty work for us, charles, you're a champ!

Annah said...

Ay Charles. I am Team Jacob because he has a tan (and a tattoo). And muscly (is that a word) guys with tattoos that growl are always fabulous in my book. As far as the books, I've only read two out of the four, don't think I'll read the last two. Stephenie Meyer's writing annoys me and I have so many other books I wish to read before I die (and hell yes the Sookie Stackhouse novels are part of the bunch, because I LOVE True Blood more than coconut cupcakes). Bella, is the most annoying heroine in modern day literature. As the story progresses she becomes more whiny, clingy, Edward obsessed, incapable of making any decisions on her own, ugh! She's no role model for any teenage girl which makes me wonder if as a teenager I would've loved these books (shudder).

I thought your review intelligent (as usual), well written, and most importantly: UNBIASED, which trust, is a lot more than I expected from your crazy serial killer self.

Now on a different note, you got this song stuck in my head. You suck.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2klTw123_jw&ob=av3e

Doug Stephens said...

Good series. I was entertained. Good job, Charles.

Charles said...

Ranter: I never thought I would read it. My readers did this to me. I cannot be blamed ;-)

Tree Goddess: No nut huggers. My nuts have to dangle freely (as you have had the misfortun of seeing repeatedly).

Mynx: Good on your son for trying something out of the ordinary (good on his teacher too). I don't see how people reading more could be a bad thing.

etoile oye: Your name intrigues me. Julia is not a great writer... but she makes up for it with her misplaced optimism and trust in the system. lol.

SaaraTuulia: Thanks for preferring me over the pissed off vampire and the illiterate teenage girl. Also: I'm not saying you should stop glaring with disapproval...

Charliesperanza: Lol... could it be any other way?

Micael: It's never good to take my word on anything. Just... as a disclaimer.

Liz: The watch is a Bulova

Kalei's friend: Thanks.

Waldoni: That metrosexual guy exudes masculine musk and sexiness everywhere he goes. And I will always try to keep an open mind when consuming media.

Steph: I agree that the book is good for escaping. And that's the point of a lot of books. It's the best part of a lot of books.

aurora: He only seems whiny when it comes to the child he wants to sex up... I get a little whiny about my girlfriend too.

Pavla: Can't touch that. Go team edward.

Fred: The Hammer had sick pants. And I would have to agree about the fox news morning team.

Barreness: Maybe the Great FireWall caught your messages and wouldn't let them through....? I can miagine your wittiness in my head though

*imagines wittiness*
*laughs hard*

I will put the obama book on the list. Don't stop sniffing superiorly. If you sniff, you have probably earned it.

Candice: Team Edward HAS to have a higher IQ. It just makes sense. There should be a study done to make sure.

Chanel: Call me mr.tacky. Also: don't call your blog crappy. That's not going to help anyone. Tell people that it's "the best blog ever". I agree with the robocop analogy.

Sucker: the book has no meaning. I didn't search for meaning. This was a search for something inside of myself.

-E: It was somewhat enjoyable. And yes, it is a little tame in some areas, which coincides nicely with our evangelical christian fox news society.

Adorkable: I concur with everything you have said. I'm glad you liked the Count Dread piece. There is a lot that can be said to attack this book.

grrrl: julia is VERY annoying.

holden: You are some kind of wizard.

Christine: You zinged me! lol. But if my kids make fun of me for my clothes, I'm just going to lock them in the closet for hours on end. That's how my parents raide me, and I turned out alright. I agree with the "I get it" thing. That's pretty much the primary thought I experienced.

Julianna: I would say that "real" love is closer to NEVER being logical...or that's how it feels. I don't know that I will be reading any more of the books.

She-She: I said no one was to mention the MC Hammer.... shame on you.

Corianda: I calculated the percentage of increased mental capacity associated with listening to NPR's "Talk of the Nation" podcasts, and then balanced Twilight out with the appropriate amount of NPR episodes, leaving me even, the way I started: dumb as a box of rocks.

Dani-Q: Glad you liked the series. Go team edward! And 12 times for real?!

Carey: Going rogue is going on the list. As is the Obama book. I will get to them both eventually. promise.

Annah: I don't know what true blood is. And i have all but given up serial killing. I just don't have time for it anymore. And ever since I can remember I've been poppin' my collar....

Laura said...

I found this series of posts really entertaining. If I didn't say it before: I would definitely enjoy hearing from Count Dread again. Julia can stay at the mall. My brain can only handle so much.

I'm surprised at your response but I think you made some decent points (that I still disagree with-the whole damn Twilight thing is a bunch of crap, imo). Do you plan to continue with the books? I ask because I know how the rest of the story (sadly, I was surrounded by women that loved it and felt the need to inform me of every disgusting plot twist) and I wonder how you'd react to some the twists in the later books. Personally, I wanted to Van Gogh myself so I wouldn't have to hear about it anymore, but since you're a little more open to the whole thing I'm curious.

Anyhow, well done! Well done, indeed!

Nicki said...

I LOVED the guest bloggers. What I loved about Julia's post was how scarily accurate it was--Julia calls Edward "Eduardo," (as a joke) her comment about Paster Dave and the purity test, feeling comfortable being just like everyone else. Sure, the constant effings and hawts were hilarious, but now I'm questioning your apparent knowledge of the teen scene ;)

But dude, lose the popped collar.

She says with love.

Jewels said...

I haven't checked the links for your guest bloggers yet, but will. As far as your break down of the book...I'd have to say its pretty dead on. I read all the books and they were okay. Nothing spectacular but they were a nice beach read...nothing you have to think about too much. I read the Harry Potter books and found those to be better written. I have also read all the Sookie Stackhouse books (yeah I know I read a lot) and loved those. It takes a lot for me to dislike a book...and I don't jump on "teams" or go fan crazy. I appreciate them for what they are and respect the writers for creating worlds that vivid.

http://jewelsturning30.blogspot.com

geets said...

I loved the review of Twilight, and smiled when you said that; "I tend to be grossed out by things that become very popular with the broader population (especially with regards to media that become popular with the youth)." I didn't see Titanic until ten years after its release and no I have not seen Matrix as yet by reason of their popularity...lol... great job!

Post a Comment

Leave a comment in good health.